Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 01:25:43PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:22:34PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: >> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 01:04:38PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 03:31:39PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: >> > > > This is v4 of Syscall User Redirection. The implementation itself is >> > > > not modified from v3, it only applies the latest round of reviews to the >> > > > selftests. >> > > > >> > > > __NR_syscalls is not really exported in header files other than >> > > > asm-generic for every architecture, so it felt safer to optionally >> > > > expose it with a fallback to a high value. >> > > > >> > > > Also, I didn't expose tests for PR_GET as that is not currently >> > > > implemented. If possible, I'd have it supported by a future patchset, >> > > > since it is not immediately necessary to support this feature. >> > > >> > > Thanks! That all looks good to me. >> > >> > Don't have any problem with this but did this ever get exposure on >> > linux-api? This is the first time I see this pop up. >> >> I thought I'd added it to CC in the past, but that might have been other >> recent unrelated threads. Does this need a full repost there too, you >> think? > > Nah, wasn't my intention to force a repost. Seems that several people > have looked this over. :) Just curious why it didn't get to linux-api > and we know quite some people who only do look at linux-api (for sanity). :) That's my mistake. I didn't think about it when submitting :( If this get re-spinned again I will make sure to CC linux-api. -- Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
