On 4/2/20 9:40 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 01:14:59PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:12:02PM +0200, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >>> On 3/29/20 5:44 AM, Kees Cook wrote: >>>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 11:32:35PM +0100, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >>>>> Oh, do I understand you right, that I can add a From: in the >>>>> *body* of the mail, and then the From: in the MIME header part >>>>> which I cannot change is ignored, so I can make you the author? >>>> >>>> Correct. (If you use "git send-email" it'll do this automatically.) >>>> >>>> e.g., trimmed from my workflow: >>>> >>>> git format-patch -n --to "$to" --cover-letter -o outgoing/ \ >>>> --subject-prefix "PATCH v$version" "$SHA" >>>> edit outgoing/0000-* >>>> git send-email --transfer-encoding=8bit --8bit-encoding=UTF-8 \ >>>> --from="$ME" --to="$to" --cc="$ME" --cc="...more..." outgoing/* >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Okay, thanks, I see that is very helpful information for me, and in >>> this case I had also fixed a small bug in one of Eric's patches, which >>> was initially overlooked (aquiring mutexes in wrong order, >>> releasing an unlocked mutex in some error paths). >>> I am completely unexperienced, and something that complex was not >>> expected to happen :-) so this is just to make sure I can handle it >>> correctly if something like this happens again. >>> >>> In the case of PATCH v6 05/16 I removed the Reviewd-by: Bernd Edlinger >>> since it is now somehow two authors and reviewing own code is obviously >>> not ok, instead I added a Signed-off-by: Bernd Edlinger (and posted the >>> whole series on Eric's behalf (after asking Eric's permissing per off-list >>> e-mail, which probably ended in his spam folder) >>> >>> Is this having two Signed-off-by: for mutliple authors the >>> correct way to handle a shared authorship? >> >> If the patch comes through you, then Reviewed-by: is inappropriate. >> Instead, you should use Signed-off-by: in the second sense of >> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst >> >> This also documents how to handle "minor changes" that you make. > > And in the true case of multiple authors, have both SoBs, but also add a > Co-developed-by: for the non-"git author" author. Specific details: > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#when-to-use-acked-by-cc-and-co-developed-by > Thanks a lot, much appreciated information indeed. I personally like to play together :-) Bernd.