On 24/03/2020 05:27, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > [...] > Before adding a new thing as both kernel parameter and sysctl, could we perhaps > not add the kernel parameter, in favor of the generic sysctl parameter solution? > [1] There were no objections and some support from Kees, so I will try to send a > new version ASAP that will work properly with all "static" sysctls - we don't > need to be blocked by a full solution for dynamically registered sysctls yet, I > guess? > > Thanks, > Vlastimil > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-api/20200317132105.24555-1-vbabka@xxxxxxx/ > Thanks Randy and Vlastimil for the comments. I really liked your approach Vlastimil, I agree that we have no reason to not have a generic sysctl setting via cmdline mechanism - I'll rework this patch removing the kernel parameter (same for other patch I just submitted). If you can CC me on the new iterations of the generic sysctl patches Vlastimil, I appreciate - I can maybe test that, I'd like to see it in kernel. Thanks, Guilherme
