Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The whole discussion was triggered by the introduction of a completely > > new fsinfo() call: > > > > Would you propose to have 'at_flags' and 'resolve_flags' passed in here? > > Yes, I think that would be the way to go. Okay, I can do that. Any thoughts on which set of flags should override the other? If we're making RESOLVE_* flags the new definitive interface, then I feel they should probably override the AT_* flags where there's a conflict, ie. RESOLVE_NO_SYMLINKS should override AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW for example. David
