Le 06/03/2020 à 09:13, Florian Weimer a écrit : > * YunQiang Su: > >> + if (bprm->interp_flags & BINPRM_FLAGS_PRESERVE_ARGV0) >> + flags |= AT_FLAGS_PRESERVE_ARGV0; >> + NEW_AUX_ENT(AT_FLAGS, flags); > > Is it necessary to reuse AT_FLAGS? I think it's cleaner to define a > separate AT_ tag dedicated to binfmt_misc. > Not necessary, but it seemed simpler and cleaner to re-use a flag that is marked as unused and with a name matching the new role. It avoids to patch other packages (like glibc) to add it as it is already defined. Thanks, Laurent
