Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 14:43:21 +0000
Cc: dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, metze@xxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, cyphar@xxxxxxxxxx, sfrench@xxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <875zfi989k.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
References: <875zfi989k.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <87y2sjlygl.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <96563.1582901612@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20200228152427.rv3crd7akwdhta2r@wittgenstein> <87h7z7ngd4.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20200302115239.pcxvej3szmricxzu@wittgenstein> <8736arnel9.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <20200302121959.it3iophjavbhtoyp@wittgenstein> <20200302123510.bm3a2zssohwvkaa4@wittgenstein> <3606975.1583418833@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> But will those be O_ flags that need to be passed to openat?

Ah, sorry, you were talking about openat().  I doubt there's sufficient O_*
space for that.

David

References:
- Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
  - From: David Howells
- Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
  - From: Christian Brauner
- Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
  - From: Christian Brauner
- Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
  - From: Christian Brauner
- Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
  - From: Christian Brauner
- Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
  - From: David Howells

Prev by Date: Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
Next by Date: Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
Previous by thread: Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
Next by thread: Re: Have RESOLVE_* flags superseded AT_* flags for new syscalls?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]