Re: [PATCH 15/19] vfs: Add superblock notifications [ver #16]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> (And as in the other case, the s->s_count increment will probably have
> to be moved above the add_watch_to_object(), unless you hold the
> sb_lock around it?)

It shouldn't matter as I'm holding s->s_umount across the add and increment.
That prevents the watch from being removed: watch_sb() would have to get the
lock first to do that.  It also deactivate_locked_super() from removing all
the watchers.

I can move it before, but I probably have to drop s_umount before I can call
put_super().

David




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux