On 2020-01-15 23:04:19 [+0100], Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 1/15/2020 5:10 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > Since commit
> > 5bbe3547aa3ba ("mm: allow compaction of unevictable pages")
> >
> > it is allowed to examine mlocked pages and compact them by default.
> > On -RT even minor pagefaults are problematic because it may take a few
> > 100us to resolve them and until then the task is blocked.
>
> Fine, this makes sense on RT I guess. There might be some trade-off for
> high-order allocation latencies though. We could perhaps migrate such mlocked
> pages to pages allocated without __GFP_MOVABLE during the mlock() to at least
> somewhat prevent them being scattered all over the zones. For MCL_FUTURE,
> allocate them as unmovable from the beginning. But that can wait until issues
> are reported.
> I assume you have similar solution for NUMA balancing and whatever else can
> cause minor faults?
I've found this one while testing. Could you please point to the NUMA
balancing that might be an issue?
> > Make compact_unevictable_allowed = 0 default and remove it from /proc on
> > RT.
>
> Removing it is maybe going too far in terms of RT kernel differences confusing
> users? Change the default sure, perhaps making it read-only, but removing?
Okay. I will make it RO then.
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190710144138.qyn4tuttdq6h7kqx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> In any case the sysctl Documentation/ should be updated? And perhaps also the
> mlock manpage as you noted in the older thread above?
Sure. Let me add the sysctl documentation to this patch and then I will
look into the manpage.
> Thanks,
> Vlastimil
Sebastian
