Hi Greg, On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 01:56:05PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 10:37:42AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:01:04AM +0800, Xu Yilum wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:45:27AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 04:08:39PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 08:01:28AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 11:34:12AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Will and Mark, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you please help us on review this patchset? as this patchset mainly > > > > > > > introduced a new perf driver following the similar way as drivers/perf/*. > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is it not under drivers/perf/, then? > > > > > > > > > > Hi Will > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the quick response. This is one sub feature for DFL based FPGAs, > > > > > and we plan to put this sub feature together with others, including related > > > > > documentation. It only registers a standard perf pmu for its userspace > > > > > interfaces. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patchset has been submitted for a long time but didn't receive any > > > > > > > comment after v4. we appreciate any review comments! thanks in advance. :) > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, not sure I saw the previous versions. Guessing I wasn't on cc? > > > > > > > > > > We switched to perf API from v4, and started ccing you and Mark from v5. :) > > > > > > > > Hi Will > > > > > > > > Did you get a chance to look into this patchset? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Hao > > > > > > Hi Will > > > > > > Did you have time to look into this patchset? We have done review work > > > for FPGA part. And as a perf driver, we appreciate your comments. > > > > > > Thanks > > > Yilun > > > > Hi Will > > > > Did you get a chance to look into this patchset these days? > > > > Actually we didn't receive any comments for a long time, if you are busy and > > don't have enough time on this, do you know if someone else could help with > > review and ack from perf driver point of view, or any other things we can do > > to speed up this? Thanks in advance! > > Hi Moritz > > Looks like still no response from Will. :( > > Do you know someone else could help? Do you have some feedback? I'm a bit confused on what to do in such a situation, do I just take the patch if the maintainer doesn't respond for a while? As always thanks for your help! Cheers, Moritz