* Florian Weimer: > * Carlos O'Donell: > >> On 9/11/19 3:08 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> * Carlos O'Donell: >>> >>>> It would be easier to merge the patch set if it were just an unconditional >>>> registration like we do for set_robust_list(). >>> >>> Note that this depends on the in-tree system call numbers list, which I >>> still need to finish according to Joseph's specifications. >> >> Which work is this? Do you have a URL reference to WIP? > > <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-05/msg00630.html> > <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-06/msg00015.html> Sorry, there was also this: <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-05/msg00629.html> I also posted a build-many-glibcs.py patch at some point with an automatic table update, but that still had the massive bot-cycle time. My current line of thinking is to implement some --use-compilers flag, so that you can build a fresh glibc checkout against an old, pre-built compilers for the system call tables update, and then use the patched glibc sources for one (and hopefully final) bot-cycle. Thanks, Florian
