On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 10:19:55AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:47 PM Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > +
> > +static int copy_rusage_to_user_any(struct rusage *kru, struct rusage __user *ru)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> > + if (in_compat_syscall())
> > + return put_compat_rusage(kru, (struct compat_rusage __user *)ru);
> > +#endif
> > + return copy_to_user(ru, kru, sizeof(*kru));
> > +}
>
> I think this code needs a check for COMPAT_USE_64BIT_TIME in order
> to handle x32 correctly.
Similar to waitid(), indeed.
>
> It would be nice to introduce it in a separate patch, and then use it
> to kill off
> compat_sys_getrusage() and compat_sys_wait4(), and possibly even
> compat_sys_waitid() in combination with your copy_siginfo_to_user_any().
> That could be done as a cleanup patch afterwards, or as part of your series.
Right, but we won't go the syscall route but instead go the P_PIDFD
route for waitid(). :)
Christian
