Hi Matthew, On Mon, 2019-06-24 at 14:06 -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 6:52 PM Dave Young <dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 06/21/19 at 01:18pm, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > I don't think so - we want it to be possible to load images if they > > > have a valid signature. > > > > I know it works like this way because of the previous patch. But from > > the patch log "When KEXEC_SIG is not enabled, kernel should not load > > images", it is simple to check it early for !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG) && > > kernel_is_locked_down(reason, LOCKDOWN_INTEGRITY) instead of depending > > on the late code to verify signature. In that way, easier to > > understand the logic, no? > > But that combination doesn't enforce signature validation? We can't > depend on !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG_FORCE) because then it'll > enforce signature validation even if lockdown is disabled. I agree with Dave. There should be a stub lockdown function to prevent enforcing lockdown when it isn't enabled. Mimi