Hello, On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:39:50PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > Which means we will enforce the effective values as: > > /tg1/tg11: > > util_min.effective=0 > i.e. keep the child protection since smaller than parent > > util_max.effective=800 > i.e. keep parent limit since stricter than child > > Please shout if I got it wrong, otherwise I'll update v10 to > implement the above logic. Everything sounds good to me. Please note that cgroup interface files actually use literal "max" for limit/protection max settings so that 0 and "max" mean the same things for all limit/protection knobs. Thanks. -- tejun
