Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > + /* Global root? */
> > + if (mnt != parent) {
> > + cursor.dentry = READ_ONCE(mnt->mnt_mountpoint);
> > + mnt = parent;
> > + cursor.mnt = &mnt->mnt;
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > + break;
>
> (nit: this would look clearer if you inverted the condition and wrote
> it as "if (mnt == parent) break;", then you also wouldn't need that
> "continue" or the braces)
It does look better with the logic inverted, but you *do* still need the
continue. After the if-statement, there is:
cursor.dentry = cursor.dentry->d_parent;
which we need to skip. It might make sense to move that into an
else-statement from an aesthetic point of view.
David
