Re: [PATCH v8 06/16] sched/core: uclamp: Extend sched_setattr() to support utilization clamping

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08-May 21:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 11:41:42AM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > @@ -1056,6 +1100,13 @@ static void __init init_uclamp(void)
> >  #else /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */
> >  static inline void uclamp_rq_inc(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { }
> >  static inline void uclamp_rq_dec(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { }
> > +static inline int uclamp_validate(struct task_struct *p,
> > +				  const struct sched_attr *attr)
> > +{
> > +	return -ENODEV;
> 
> Does that maybe want to be -EOPNOTSUPP ?

Suren propose ENOSYS for another similar case, i.e.
!CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK definitions.

But EOPNOTSUPP seems more appropriate to me too.

-- 
#include <best/regards.h>

Patrick Bellasi



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux