Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] signal: support CLONE_PIDFD with pidfd_send_signal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/16, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> @@ -3581,12 +3588,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(pidfd_send_signal, int, pidfd, int, sig,
>  	if (flags)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>
> -	f = fdget_raw(pidfd);
> +	f = fdget(pidfd);

could you explain this change?

I am just curious, I don't understand why should we disallow O_PATH and how
this connects to this patch.

Oleg.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux