On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 07:19:30PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: [snip] > > > > I am actually supportive of Daniel's view that by combining too many > > > > arguments into a single syscall, becomes confusing and sometimes some > > > > arguments have to be forced to 0 in the single shoe-horned syscall. Like you > > > > > > There's a difference between an ioctl() and say seccomp() which this is > > > close to: > > > int seccomp(unsigned int operation, unsigned int flags, void *args); > > > The point is that the functionality is closely related not just randomly > > > unrelated stuff. But as I said I'm more than willing to compromise. > > > > Sounds great, yeah whatever makes sense. > > In case I haven't said this enough: I really appreciate the discussion > and in general the help on this. That probably sometimes gets lost in > mails sometimes. :) I appreciate you saying that and thanks for the work on this :) - Joel
