Re: [PATCHSET v11] io_uring IO interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 08:23 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
+AD4 Here's v11 of the io+AF8-uring project. Main fixes in this release is a
+AD4 rework of how we grab the ctx-+AD4-uring+AF8-lock, never using trylock for it in
+AD4 a user visible way. Outside of that, fixes around locking for the polled
+AD4 list when we hit -EAGAIN conditions on IO submit. This fixes list
+AD4 corruption issues with polling that some users have reported.
+AD4 
+AD4 As far as I'm concerned, this project is ready to get staged for 5.1.
+AD4 Please do review carefully so we can fix any minor nits that might still
+AD4 exist.
+AD4 
+AD4 The liburing git repo has a full set of man pages for this, though they
+AD4 could probably still use a bit of polish. I'd also like to see a
+AD4 io+AF8-uring(7) man page to describe the overall design of the project,
+AD4 expect that in the not-so-distant future. You can clone that here:
+AD4 
+AD4 git://git.kernel.dk/liburing
+AD4 
+AD4 Patches are against 5.0-rc4, and can also be found in my io+AF8-uring branch
+AD4 here:
+AD4 
+AD4 git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block io+AF8-uring
+AD4 
+AD4 Changes since v10:
+AD4 - Rework uring+AF8-lock locking
+AD4 - Ensure that async contexts lock when fiddling with polled lists
+AD4 - Minor tweak to io+AF8-iopoll+AF8-check() continue looping condition
+AD4 - Fold +AF8AXw-io+AF8-uring+AF8-enter() into io+AF8-uring+AF8-enter()

Hi Jens,

Which goal(s) do you want to realize with this new API? Is the goal perhaps
to reduce the overhead of submitting I/O and receiving I/O completions?
If so, where can I find a comparison of the performance of this API with
libaio and synchronous I/O?

Thanks,

Bart.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux