On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:41:29PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > On 22-Jan 16:13, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 02:43:29PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote: > > > Do you think that could be acceptable? > > > > Think so, it's a sysctl poke, 'nobody' ever does that. > > Cool, so... I'll keep lazy update for system default. Ah, I think I misunderstood. I meant to say that since nobody ever pokes at sysctl's it doesn't matter if its a little more expensive and iterate everything. Also; if you always keep everything up-to-date, you can avoid doing that duplicate accounting.
