----- On Dec 4, 2018, at 2:44 PM, Florian Weimer fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > * Mathieu Desnoyers: > >> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/riscv/rv64/libpthread.abilist >> b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/riscv/rv64/libpthread.abilist >> index c370fda73d..9da78d59d2 100644 >> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/riscv/rv64/libpthread.abilist >> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/riscv/rv64/libpthread.abilist >> @@ -235,3 +235,4 @@ GLIBC_2.28 tss_create F >> GLIBC_2.28 tss_delete F >> GLIBC_2.28 tss_get F >> GLIBC_2.28 tss_set F >> +GLIBC_2.29 __rseq_refcount T 0x4 > > This part looks buggy. > > It's unclear based on this patch whether you actually want to get rid of > the __rseq_refcount symbol. I want to keep the __rseq_refcount symbol so out-of-libc users can register rseq if they are linked against a pre-2.29 libc. Why does it look buggy ? Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com
