* Michael Kerrisk: > I'm not sure I'd view the glibc position quite so harshly (although > it is disappointing to me that bug 6399 remains open). I think they > are simply short of people to work on this task. There was a lengthy > period where no syscall wrappers were being added (pretty much from > 2.16 to 2.24, as far as I can tell), but that has changed. People may have disappeared from glibc development who have objected to gettid. I thought this was the case with strlcpy/strlcat, but it was not. At present, it takes one semi-active glibc contributor to block addition of a system call. The process to override a sustained objection has never been used successfully, and it is a lot of work to get it even started. Thanks, Florian