On Sun, Aug 5, 2018 at 4:32 AM Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Create a new audit record AUDIT_CONTAINER to document the audit > container identifier of a process if it is present. > > Called from audit_log_exit(), syscalls are covered. > > A sample raw event: > type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1519924845.499:257): arch=c000003e syscall=257 success=yes exit=3 a0=ffffff9c a1=56374e1cef30 a2=241 a3=1b6 items=2 ppid=606 pid=635 auid=0 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=pts0 ses=3 comm="bash" exe="/usr/bin/bash" subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key="tmpcontainerid" > type=CWD msg=audit(1519924845.499:257): cwd="/root" > type=PATH msg=audit(1519924845.499:257): item=0 name="/tmp/" inode=13863 dev=00:27 mode=041777 ouid=0 ogid=0 rdev=00:00 obj=system_u:object_r:tmp_t:s0 nametype= PARENT cap_fp=0000000000000000 cap_fi=0000000000000000 cap_fe=0 cap_fver=0 > type=PATH msg=audit(1519924845.499:257): item=1 name="/tmp/tmpcontainerid" inode=17729 dev=00:27 mode=0100644 ouid=0 ogid=0 rdev=00:00 obj=unconfined_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0 nametype=CREATE cap_fp=0000000000000000 cap_fi=0000000000000000 cap_fe=0 cap_fver=0 > type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(1519924845.499:257): proctitle=62617368002D6300736C65657020313B206563686F2074657374203E202F746D702F746D70636F6E7461696E65726964 > type=CONTAINER msg=audit(1519924845.499:257): op=task contid=123458 > > See: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/90 > See: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-userspace/issues/51 > See: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-testsuite/issues/64 > See: https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/wiki/RFE-Audit-Container-ID > Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/audit.h | 7 +++++++ > include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 1 + > kernel/audit.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > kernel/auditsc.c | 3 +++ > 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+) ... > @@ -2045,6 +2045,30 @@ void audit_log_session_info(struct audit_buffer *ab) > audit_log_format(ab, " auid=%u ses=%u", auid, sessionid); > } > > +/* > + * audit_log_contid - report container info > + * @tsk: task to be recorded > + * @context: task or local context for record > + * @op: contid string description > + */ > +int audit_log_contid(struct task_struct *tsk, > + struct audit_context *context, char *op) > +{ > + struct audit_buffer *ab; > + > + if (!audit_contid_set(tsk)) > + return 0; > + /* Generate AUDIT_CONTAINER record with container ID */ > + ab = audit_log_start(context, GFP_KERNEL, AUDIT_CONTAINER); > + if (!ab) > + return -ENOMEM; > + audit_log_format(ab, "op=%s contid=%llu", > + op, audit_get_contid(tsk)); > + audit_log_end(ab); > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(audit_log_contid); As discussed in the previous iteration of the patch, I prefer AUDIT_CONTAINER_ID here over AUDIT_CONTAINER. If you feel strongly about keeping it as-is with AUDIT_CONTAINER I suppose I could live with that, but it is isn't my first choice. However, I do care about the "op" field in this record. It just doesn't make any sense; the way you are using it it is more of a context field than an operations field, and even then why is the context important from a logging and/or security perspective? Drop it please. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com
