>> > >> >What about using more conventional size_t instead of "unsigned long long" ? >> >> size_t is also equivalent to unsigned long and it will not hold value of (1 << 35) for 32 bit system. >> So we can do two things. > >Wouldn't the 'correct' type be off_t ? >In any case, IIRC, you have to do really horrid things in Linux to >access files larger than 2G on 32bit systems. > > David Any inputs. Thanks, Maninder Singh
