On 07/10/2018 03:26 PM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > + /* > + * On platforms before CET, other threads could race to > + * create a RO and _PAGE_DIRTY_HW PMD again. However, > + * on CET platforms, this is safe without a TLB flush. > + */ If I didn't work for Intel, I'd wonder what the heck CET is and what the heck it has to do with _PAGE_DIRTY_HW. I think we need a better comment than this. How about: Some processors can _start_ a write, but end up seeing a read-only PTE by the time they get to getting the Dirty bit. In this case, they will set the Dirty bit, leaving a read-only, Dirty PTE which looks like a Shadow Stack PTE. However, this behavior has been improved and will *not* occur on processors supporting Shadow Stacks. Without this guarantee, a transition to a non-present PTE and flush the TLB would be needed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
