On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:55:13AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > On Wed, 30 May 2018, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:42:31AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > > > > > For the sake of simplicity, Linus suggested directly using HASH_MIN_SIZE > > > such that we have a single fallback. > > > > Where did he suggest that? > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/24/1265 Well I think we should respect min_size. rhashtable users may fail at insertion time if the table is too small. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
