On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 06:32:25AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->ctx_lock, flags); > > + list_add_tail(&aiocb->ki_list, &ctx->delayed_cancel_reqs); > > + spin_unlock(&ctx->ctx_lock); > > ... and io_cancel(2) comes, finds it and inhume^Wcompletes it, leaving us to... > > > + spin_lock(&req->head->lock); > > ... get buggered on attempt to dereference a pointer fetched from freed and > reused object. FWIW, how painful would it be to pull the following trick: * insert into wait queue under ->ctx_lock * have wakeup do schedule_work() with aio_complete() done from that * have ->ki_cancel() grab queue lock, remove from queue and use the same schedule_work() That way you'd get ->ki_cancel() with the same semantics as originally for everything - "ask politely to finish ASAP", and called in the same locking environment for everyone - under ->ctx_lock, that is. queue lock nests inside ->ctx_lock; no magical flags, etc. The cost is schedule_work() for each async poll-related completion as you have for fsync. I don't know whether that's too costly or not; it certainly simplifies the things, but whether it's OK performance-wise... Comments? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
