Re: [PATCH 1/2 V2] fs: hoist BTRFS_IOC_[SG]ET_FSLABEL to vfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 08:16:09PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 01:13:57PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Move the btrfs label ioctls up to the vfs for general use.
> > 
> > This retains 256 chars as the maximum size through the interface, which
> > is the btrfs limit and AFAIK exceeds any other filesystem's maximum
> > label size.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> No objections (and it obviously ought to go through btrfs tree).

I can take it through my tree, but Eric mentioned that there's a patch
for xfs that depends on it. In this case it would make sense to take
both patches at once via the xfs tree. There are no pending conflicting
changes in btrfs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux