On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:17:41PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 12:03:28AM +0000, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > Groovy, thanks, let's not forget the xfs_repair respective fix :) let me know > > if you have any feedback on that. > > TBH I've lost any proposed xfs_repair patches to the mists of time > because some patch volcano keeps erupting on the lists. :P > > Uh... I think it's fine for xfs_{repair,scrub} to clear the immutable > and append flags on any special inodes it finds, particularly since > neither flag has any real meaning for block/char/fifo/socket/symlinks > anyway. Sure, my point during review of that series for xfs_repair in particular though was that for symlinks the justification is different (half of the commit log in this new patch), as such I'd prefer to deal with them in a separate follow up patch. Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html