Re: [RESEND PATCH V4] pidns: introduce syscall translate_pid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 04/03/2018 02:52 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:45:28 -0700 Nagarathnam Muthusamy <nagarathnam.muthusamy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This changelog doesn't explain what the value is to our users.  I
assume it is a performance optimization because "backward translation
requires scanning all tasks"?  If so, please show us real-world
examples of the performance benefit from this patch, and please go to
great lengths to explain to us why this optimisation is needed by our
users.
One of the usecase by Oracle database involves multiple levels of
nested pid namespaces and we require pid translation between the
levels. Discussions on the particular usecase, why any of the existing
methods was not usable happened in the following thread.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10276785/

At the end, it was agreed that this patch along with flocks will solve the
issue.
Nobody who reads this patch's changelog will know any of this.  Please
let's get all this information into the proper place.
Sure! Will resend the patch with updated change log.

Thanks,
Nagarathnam.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux