Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, tracing: unbreak lttng

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/26/18 3:30 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
----- On Mar 26, 2018, at 6:08 PM, Alexei Starovoitov ast@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[...]

#ifdef CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS
-void *
-for_each_kernel_tracepoint(void *(*fct)(struct tracepoint *tp, void *priv),
+void
+for_each_kernel_tracepoint(void (*fct)(struct tracepoint *tp, void *priv),
			   void *priv);
+struct tracepoint *kernel_tracepoint_find_by_name(const char *name);
#else
-static inline void *
-for_each_kernel_tracepoint(void *(*fct)(struct tracepoint *tp, void *priv),
+static inline void
+for_each_kernel_tracepoint(void (*fct)(struct tracepoint *tp, void *priv),
			   void *priv)
{
	return NULL;
}

This patch is not reverting to the old code properly. It introduces a
static inline void function that returns NULL. Please compile-test
with CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS=n before submitting a patch involving tracepoints.

right. good catch. v2 is coming.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux