Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf, tracing: unbreak lttng

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/26/18 3:15 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:08:45 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

for_each_kernel_tracepoint() is used by out-of-tree lttng module
and therefore cannot be changed.
Instead introduce kernel_tracepoint_find_by_name() to find
tracepoint by name.

Fixes: 9e9afbae6514 ("tracepoint: compute num_args at build time")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>

I'm curious, why can't you rebase? The first patch was never acked.

because I think it makes sense to keep such things in the commit log
and in the separate diff, so next developer is aware of what kind of
minefield the tracpoints are.
No wonder some maintainers refuse to add them.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux