Re: [PATCH net-next] modules: allow modprobe load regular elf binaries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/7/18 5:23 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:

request_module() has its own world though too. How often in your proof of
concept is request_module() called? How many times do you envision it being
called?

once.

+static int run_umh(struct file *file)
+{
+	struct subprocess_info *sub_info = call_usermodehelper_setup_file(file);
+
+	if (!sub_info)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	return call_usermodehelper_exec(sub_info, UMH_WAIT_EXEC);
+}

run_umh() calls the program and waits. Note that while we are running a UMH we
can't suspend. What if they take forever, who is hosing them down with an
equivalent:

	schedule();
	try_to_freeze();

Say they are buggy and never return, will they stall suspend, have you tried?

call_usermodehelper_exec() uses helper_lock() which in turn is used for
umh's accounting for number of running umh's. One of the sad obscure uses
for this is to deal with suspend/resume. Refer to __usermodehelper* calls
on kernel/power/process.c

Note how you use UMH_WAIT_EXEC too, so this is all synchronous.

looks like you misread this code and the rest of your concerns
with suspend/resume are not applicable any more.

#define UMH_NO_WAIT     0       /* don't wait at all */
#define UMH_WAIT_EXEC   1       /* wait for the exec, but not the process */
#define UMH_WAIT_PROC   2       /* wait for the process to complete */
#define UMH_KILLABLE    4       /* wait for EXEC/PROC killable */

bpftiler.ko is started once and runs non-stop from there on.
Unless it crashes, but it's a different discussion.

+	if (info->hdr->e_type == ET_EXEC) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_SIG
+		if (!info->sig_ok) {
+			pr_notice_once("umh %s verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel\n",
+				       info->file->f_path.dentry->d_name.name);
+			add_taint(TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
+		}
+#endif

So I guess this check is done *after* run_umh() then, what about the enforce mode,
don't we want to reject loading at all in any circumstance?

already answered this twice in the thread.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux