On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 02:36:07PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 03/01/2018 05:19 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > This patch set is a different way to address the pressing need to access > > task_struct pointers in sched tracepoints from bpf programs. > > > > The first approach simply added these pointers to sched tracepoints: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/14/753 > > which Peter nacked. > > Few options were discussed and eventually the discussion converged on > > doing bpf specific tracepoint_probe_register() probe functions. > > Details here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/20/929 > > Ping, Peter/Steven. If you have a chance, please review the series. This series doesn't really touch anything I maintain, but the general appraoch seems sane to me. I like the first patch that ensures structures are passed by reference. The rest is all tracepoint/bpf glue and I never really got into the bpf internals, so I don't think I've got anything useful to say there. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
