Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] arm64: fpsimd: Fix bad si_code for undiagnosed SIGFPE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 12:27:16 -0600

> Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 03:13:08PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> However, the purpose of this as an RFC was to get feedback on whether
>> adding FPE_UNKNOWN is considered acceptable at all from an API
>> perspective -- the precise number doesn't matter for that discussion.
>>
>> Do you have any view on this?
> 
> That seems as good a solution as any too me.  It is reality and it
> happens in the code and there are several places of the same form I
> would use it, just to get rid of the FPE_FIXME.

Eric, feel free to do something similar on Sparc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux