Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH resend 2/2] userns: control capabilities of some user namespaces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/06/2017 10:23 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
I think I definately prefer what I mentioned in the email to Boris.
Basically a "permanent capability bounding set".  The normal bounding
set gets reset to a full set on every new user_ns creation.  In this
proposal, it would instead be set to the calling task's permanent
capability set, which starts (at boot) full, and which privileged
tasks can pull capabilities out of.

Actually, this may solve a similar problem I've been looking at. The idea was basically at strategic points in the kernel (possibly LSM hook sites, still evaluating, and probably syscall entry) validate that a task has not "magically" acquired capabilities that it or parent specifically said it cannot have and then take some action like say killing it immediately. Using your terms, basically make the "permanent capability set" a write-once privilege escalation defense. To handle the 0-day threat, perhaps make it writable but only with more "restrictive" values.

-chrish
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux