Re: [PATCH 1/3] printk: Introduce per-console loglevel setting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/20/2017 01:05 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Thu 2017-10-19 16:40:45, Calvin Owens wrote:
On 09/28/2017 05:43 PM, Calvin Owens wrote:
Not all consoles are created equal: depending on the actual hardware,
the latency of a printk() call can vary dramatically. The worst examples
are serial consoles, where it can spin for tens of milliseconds banging
the UART to emit a message, which can cause application-level problems
when the kernel spews onto the console.

Any thoughts on this series? Happy to resend again, but if there are no
objections I'd love to see it merged sooner rather than later :)

Happy to resend too, just let me know.

There is no need to resend the patch. It is on my radar and I am
going to look at it.

Please, be patient, you hit conference, illness, after vacation
season. We do not want to unnecessarily delay it but it is
not a trivial change that might be accepted within minutes.

No worries, just wanted to make sure it hadn't been missed :)

Thanks,
Calvin

Best Regards,
Petr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux