On 04/03, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > You have asked why I have problems with your patch and so I am going to > try to explain. Partly I want to see a clean set of patches that we > can merge into Linus's tree before we make any compromises. Because the > work preparing a clean patchset may inform us of something better. Plus > we need to make something clean and long term maintainable in any event. > > Partly I object because your understanding and my understanding of > cred_guard_mutex are very different. And I think there is another problem, your understanding and my understanding of "clean" differ too much and it seems that we can not convince each other ;) The last series looks buggy (I'll send more emails later today), but the main problem is that - in my opinion! - your approach is "obviously wrong and much less clean". But yes, yes, I understand that this is my opinion, and I can be wrong. Eric, I think we need more CC's. Linus, probably security list, the more the better. I am going to resend my series with more CC's, then you can nack it and explain what you think we should do. Perhaps someone else will suggest a better solution, or at least review the patches. OK? Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
