It seems to be that all of the new cgroup+bpf hooks and all of the proposed networking-related ones that I'm aware of look at sock_cgroup_ptr(). I'm wondering if this could me made cgroup v1 compatible? As far as I can tell, this could be done with no changes at all to the networking code and only minor changes to the cgroup code. Specifically, there would be a new "socket" controller. Its effect would be that cgroup_sk_alloc() would load the current socket cgroup instead of the current default cgroup, assuming that a socket cgroup were installed. Would this work? I realize that there a moratorium on new fields in sock (for good reasons), but this would require a new field or even have a significant effect on the meaning of existing fields. Instead it would just change how the cgroup that's loaded into the existing field is selected. Would this be doable? If so, would it be useful? (If this were done, then presumably cgroup+lsm+bpf would consider becoming a controller as well.) --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
