On 14/09/2016 21:07, Jann Horn wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 09:24:00AM +0200, Mickaël Salaün wrote: >> Add eBPF functions to compare file system access with a Landlock file >> system handle: >> * bpf_landlock_cmp_fs_prop_with_struct_file(prop, map, map_op, file) >> This function allows to compare the dentry, inode, device or mount >> point of the currently accessed file, with a reference handle. >> * bpf_landlock_cmp_fs_beneath_with_struct_file(opt, map, map_op, file) >> This function allows an eBPF program to check if the current accessed >> file is the same or in the hierarchy of a reference handle. > [...] >> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c >> index 94256597eacd..edaab4c87292 100644 >> --- a/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c >> +++ b/kernel/bpf/arraymap.c >> @@ -603,6 +605,9 @@ static void landlock_put_handle(struct map_landlock_handle *handle) >> enum bpf_map_handle_type handle_type = handle->type; >> >> switch (handle_type) { >> + case BPF_MAP_HANDLE_TYPE_LANDLOCK_FS_FD: >> + path_put(&handle->path); >> + break; >> case BPF_MAP_HANDLE_TYPE_UNSPEC: >> default: >> WARN_ON(1); > [...] >> diff --git a/security/landlock/checker_fs.c b/security/landlock/checker_fs.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..39eb85dc7d18 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/security/landlock/checker_fs.c > [...] >> +static inline u64 bpf_landlock_cmp_fs_prop_with_struct_file(u64 r1_property, >> + u64 r2_map, u64 r3_map_op, u64 r4_file, u64 r5) >> +{ >> + u8 property = (u8) r1_property; >> + struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *) (unsigned long) r2_map; >> + enum bpf_map_array_op map_op = r3_map_op; >> + struct file *file = (struct file *) (unsigned long) r4_file; >> + struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map); >> + struct path *p1, *p2; >> + struct map_landlock_handle *handle; >> + int i; > > Please don't use int when iterating over an array, use size_t. OK, I will use size_t. > > >> + /* for now, only handle OP_OR */ > > Is "OP_OR" an appropriate name for something that ANDs the success of > checks? > > > [...] >> + synchronize_rcu(); > > Can you put a comment here that explains what's going on? Hum, this should not be here. > > >> + for (i = 0; i < array->n_entries; i++) { >> + bool result_dentry = !(property & LANDLOCK_FLAG_FS_DENTRY); >> + bool result_inode = !(property & LANDLOCK_FLAG_FS_INODE); >> + bool result_device = !(property & LANDLOCK_FLAG_FS_DEVICE); >> + bool result_mount = !(property & LANDLOCK_FLAG_FS_MOUNT); >> + >> + handle = (struct map_landlock_handle *) >> + (array->value + array->elem_size * i); >> + >> + if (handle->type != BPF_MAP_HANDLE_TYPE_LANDLOCK_FS_FD) { >> + WARN_ON(1); >> + return -EFAULT; >> + } >> + p1 = &handle->path; >> + >> + if (!result_dentry && p1->dentry == p2->dentry) >> + result_dentry = true; > > Why is this safe? As far as I can tell, this is not in an RCU read-side > critical section (synchronize_rcu() was just called), and no lock has been > taken. What prevents someone from removing the arraymap entry while we're > looking at it? Am I missing something? I will try to properly deal with RCU.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature