Re: [RFC v2 00/10] Landlock LSM: Unprivileged sandboxing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 30/08/2016 18:06, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Mickaël Salaün <mic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This series is a proof of concept to fill some missing part of seccomp as the
>>> ability to check syscall argument pointers or creating more dynamic security
>>> policies. The goal of this new stackable Linux Security Module (LSM) called
>>> Landlock is to allow any process, including unprivileged ones, to create
>>> powerful security sandboxes comparable to the Seatbelt/XNU Sandbox or the
>>> OpenBSD Pledge. This kind of sandbox help to mitigate the security impact of
>>> bugs or unexpected/malicious behaviors in userland applications.
>>
>> Mickaël, will you be at KS and/or LPC?
>>
>
> I won't be at KS/LPC but I will give a talk at Kernel Recipes (Paris)
> for which registration will start Thursday (and will not last long). :)

There's a teeny tiny chance I'll be there.  I've done way too much
traveling lately.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux