Re: [PATCH 2/4] selftests/sigaltstack: Fix the sas test on old kernels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



03.05.2016 20:31, Andy Lutomirski пишет:
The handling for old kernels was wrong.  Fix it.

Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Stas Sergeev <stsp@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c
index 57da8bfde60b..a98c3ef8141f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sigaltstack/sas.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
  #include <alloca.h>
  #include <string.h>
  #include <assert.h>
+#include <errno.h>
#ifndef SS_AUTODISARM
  #define SS_AUTODISARM  (1 << 4)
@@ -117,13 +118,19 @@ int main(void)
  	stk.ss_flags = SS_ONSTACK | SS_AUTODISARM;
  	err = sigaltstack(&stk, NULL);
  	if (err) {
-		perror("[FAIL]\tsigaltstack(SS_ONSTACK | SS_AUTODISARM)");
-		stk.ss_flags = SS_ONSTACK;
-	}
-	err = sigaltstack(&stk, NULL);
-	if (err) {
-		perror("[FAIL]\tsigaltstack(SS_ONSTACK)");
-		return EXIT_FAILURE;
+		if (errno == EINVAL) {
+			printf("[NOTE]\tThe running kernel doesn't support SS_AUTODISARM\n");
+			/*
+			 * If test cases for the !SS_AUTODISARM variant were
+			 * added, we could still run them.  We don't have any
+			 * test cases like that yet, so just exit and report
+			 * success.
+			 */
But that was the point, please see how it handles the
old kernels:

$ ./sas
[FAIL]    sigaltstack(SS_ONSTACK | SS_AUTODISARM): Invalid argument
[RUN]    signal USR1
[FAIL]    ss_flags=1, should be SS_DISABLE
[RUN]    switched to user ctx
[RUN]    signal USR2
[FAIL]    sigaltstack re-used
[FAIL]    Stack corrupted
[RUN]    Aborting

Unfortunalely, for Ingo it crashed...
I am not sure why, I can't reproduce. :(
So if you disable all the "old" tests, you can as well
remove them, or... find the bug and re-enable. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux