On 03/10/2016 04:38 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 02:20:31PM -0800, Gregory Farnum wrote:
I really am sensitive to the security concerns, just know that if it's
a permanent blocker you're essentially blocking out a growing category
of disk users (who run on an awfully large number of disks!).
Or they just have to use kernels with out-of-tree patches installed. :-P
If you want to consider how many disks Google has that are using this
patch, I probably could have appealed to Linus and asked him to accept
the patch if I forced the issue. The only reason why I didn't was
that people like Ric Wheeler threatened to have distro-specific
patches to disable the feature, and at the end of the day, I didn't
care that much. After all, if it makes it harder for large scale
cloud companies besides Google to create more efficient userspace
cluster file systems, it's not like I was keeping the patch a secret.
So ultimately, if the Ceph developers want to make a case to Red Hat
management that this is important, great. If not, it's not that hard
for those people who need the patch and who are running large cloud
infrastructures to simply apply the out-of-tree patch if they need it.
Cheers,
- Ted
What was objectionable at the time this patch was raised years back (not just to
me, but to pretty much every fs developer at LSF/MM that year) centered on the
concern that this would be viewed as a "performance" mode and we get pressure to
support this for non-priveleged users. It gives any user effectively the ability
to read the block device content for previously allocated data without restriction.
At the time, I also don't recall seeing the patch posted on upstream lists for
debate or justification.
As we discussed a few weeks back, I don't object to having support for doing
this in carefully controlled ways for things like user space file systems. In
effect, the problem of preventing other people's data being handed over to the
end user is taken on by that layer of code. I suspect that fits the use case at
google and Ceph both.
Regards,
Ric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
