Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/6] (mostly) Arch-independent livepatch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 03:54:22PM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2016, Jessica Yu wrote:
> 
> > Jessica Yu (6):
> >   Elf: add livepatch-specific Elf constants
> >   module: preserve Elf information for livepatch modules
> >   module: s390: keep mod_arch_specific for livepatch modules
> >   livepatch: reuse module loader code to write relocations
> >   samples: livepatch: mark as livepatch module
> >   Documentation: livepatch: outline Elf format and requirements for
> >     patch modules
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I walked through the code and it looks good except for several minor 
> things in the fourth patch (livepatch: reuse module loader code to write 
> relocations). I'd propose to send the next version as a regular PATCH set 
> and not RFC. We can start collecting Reviews and Acks. Hopefully it won't 
> take more than one or two iterations. Would that be ok with everyone?

Sounds good to me...

-- 
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux