On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Josh Triplett wrote: > With the dynamic allocation removed, this seems sensible to me. One > minor nit: s/int32_t/uint32_t/g, since a location intended to hold a CPU > number should never need to hold a negative number. You try to block the future of computing: https://lwn.net/Articles/638673/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
