* Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > (Adding Mark to cc's) > > On 01/12/2016 05:07 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > >On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 04:15:50PM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote: > >>Ping! There has been no substantive feedback to this version of > >>the patch in the week since I posted it, which optimistically suggests > >>to me that people may be satisfied with it. If that's true, Frederic, > >>I assume this would be pulled into your tree? > >> > >>I have slightly updated the v9 patch series since this posting: > >> > >>[...] > >> > >>- Incorporated Mark Rutland's changes to convert arm64 > >> assembly to C code instead of using my own version. > >Please avoid queuing these patches -- the first is already in the arm64 > >queue for 4.5 and the second was found to introduce a substantial > >performance regression on the syscall entry/exit path. I think Mark had > >an updated version to address that, so it would be easier not to have > >an old version sitting in some other queue! > > I am not formally queueing them anywhere (like linux-next), though > now that you mention it, that's a pretty good idea - I'll talk to Steven > about that, assuming this merge window closes without the task > isolation stuff going in. NAK. Given the controversy, no way should this stuff go outside the primary trees it affects: the scheduler, timer, irq, etc. trees. We can merge this up in -tip once everyone is happy... but as I said, don't expect many replies before and during the merge window. Thanks, Ingo> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
