On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:45:28AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 09:26:04AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:28:05 +0900
> > Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:42:25AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:33:25 +0900
> > > > Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Steven, is it possible to add tracepoint to inlined fucntion such as
> > > > > get_page() in include/linux/mm.h?
> > > >
> > > > I highly recommend against it. The tracepoint code adds a bit of bloat,
> > > > and if you inline it, you add that bloat to every use case. Also, it
> > >
> > > Is it worse than adding function call to my own stub function into
> > > inlined function such as get_page(). I implemented it as following.
> > >
> > > get_page()
> > > {
> > > atomic_inc()
> > > stub_get_page()
> > > }
> > >
> > > stub_get_page() in foo.c
> > > {
> > > trace_page_ref_get_page()
> > > }
> >
> > Now you just slowed down the fast path. But what you could do is:
> >
> > get_page()
> > {
> > atomic_inc();
> > if (trace_page_ref_get_page_enabled())
> > stub_get_page();
> > }
> >
> > Now that "trace_page_ref_get_page_enabled()" will turn into:
> >
> > if (static_key_false(&__tracepoint_page_ref_get_page.key)) {
> >
> > which is a jump label (nop when disabled, a jmp when enabled). That's
> > less bloat but doesn't solve the include problem. You still need to add
> > the include of that will cause havoc with other tracepoints.
>
> Yes, It also has a include dependency problem so I can't use
> trace_page_ref_get_page_enabled() in mm.h. BTW, I tested following
> implementation and it works fine.
>
> extern struct tracepoint __tracepoint_page_ref_get_page;
>
> get_page()
> {
> atomic_inc()
> if (static_key_false(&__tracepoint_page_ref_get_page.key))
> stub_get_page()
> }
>
> This would not slow down fast path although it can't prevent bloat.
> I know that it isn't good code practice, but, this page reference
> handling functions have complex include dependency so I'm not sure
> I can solve it completely. For this special case, can I use
> this raw data structure?
>
Steven, any comment?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
