On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 22:50 +0200, Bendik Rønning Opstad wrote:
>
> +/**
> + * tcp_stream_is_thin_dpifl() - Tests if the stream is thin based on dynamic PIF
> + * limit
> + * @tp: the tcp_sock struct
> + *
> + * Return: true if current packets in flight (PIF) count is lower than
> + * the dynamic PIF limit, else false
> + */
> +static inline bool tcp_stream_is_thin_dpifl(const struct tcp_sock *tp)
> +{
> + u64 dpif_lim = tp->srtt_us >> 3;
> + /* Div by is_thin_min_itt_lim, the minimum allowed ITT
> + * (Inter-transmission time) in usecs.
> + */
> + do_div(dpif_lim, tp->thin_dpifl_itt_lower_bound);
> + return tcp_packets_in_flight(tp) < dpif_lim;
> +}
> +
This is very strange :
You are using a do_div() while both operands are 32bits. A regular
divide would be ok :
u32 dpif_lim = (tp->srtt_us >> 3) / tp->thin_dpifl_itt_lower_bound;
But then, you can avoid the divide by using a multiply, less expensive :
return (u64)tcp_packets_in_flight(tp) * tp->thin_dpifl_itt_lower_bound <
(tp->srtt_us >> 3);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
