On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Rob, > >> On Oct 21, 2015, at 00:54 , Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Pantelis Antoniou >> <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi Rob, >>> >>>> On Oct 21, 2015, at 00:04 , Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Pantelis Antoniou >>>> <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> * A per overlay can_remove sysfs attribute that reports whether >>>>> the overlay can be removed or not due to another overlapping overlay. >>>>> >>>>> * A target sysfs attribute listing the target of each fragment, >>>>> in a group named after the name of the fragment. >> >> [...] >> >>>>> @@ -255,6 +278,17 @@ err_fail: >>>>> return -EINVAL; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> +static ssize_t target_show(struct kobject *kobj, >>>>> + struct fragment_attribute *fattr, char *buf) >>>>> +{ >>>>> + struct of_overlay_info *ovinfo = fattr->ovinfo; >>>>> + >>>>> + return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%s\n", >>>>> + of_node_full_name(ovinfo->target)); >>>> >>>> This can be a link to the node itself, can't it? >>>> >>> >>> Yes. Do you want it like this? >> >> Yes, hence the suggestion. Unless you see some reason why not. >> > > Nope, can’t be done. The sysfs API only allows linking one kobj to another. > The kobj is the overlay but the target is in the fragment attribute group. Can't we make the fragments kobj's as well? Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html