On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 15:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:09:34 -0700 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > As suggested during the RFC process, tests have been proposed to > > libhugetlbfs as described at: > > http://librelist.com/browser//libhugetlbfs/2015/6/25/patch-tests-add-tests-for-fallocate-system-call/ Great! > > I didn't know that libhugetlbfs has tests. I wonder if that makes > tools/testing/selftests/vm's hugetlbfstest harmful? Why harmful? Redundant, maybe(?). Does anyone even use selftests for hugetlbfs regression testing? Lets see, we also have these: - hugepage-{mmap,shm}.c - map_hugetlb.c There's probably a lot of room for improvement here. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
