On 05/13/2015 05:34 PM, Darren Hart wrote: > On 5/13/15, 4:22 PM, "Shuah Khan" <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 05/12/2015 10:07 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >>> Hi Shuah, >>> >>> This series begins the process of migrating my futextest tests into >>> kselftest. >>> I've started with only the functional tests, as the performance and >>> stress may >>> not be appropriate for kselftest as they stand. >>> >>> I cleaned up various complaints from checkpatch, but I ignored others >>> that would >>> require significant rework of the testcases, such as not using volatile >>> and not >>> creating new typedefs. >>> >> >> Daren, >> >> This patch series is good. kselftest run and install >> are good. I see the following results. Something you >> would expect?? > > Yes, that is all expected behavior if you don't run as root and your user > doesn't have the necessary capabilities added - similar to other tests > with privileged operations. > >> No Issues and I am going to get them >> into 4.2 - should show up in linux-kselftest next. > > Great, thanks. Perhaps some explicit capabilities tests and clearer error > messages would make sense as a follow-on patch. > > Thanks for working with me to get these into the kernel, I think it will > improve futex test exposure and hopefully encourage people to write more > tests to fill some of the gaps. > Applied to linux-kselftest next for 4.2 thanks, -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Sr. Linux Kernel Developer Open Source Innovation Group Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 217-8978 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
